Your #1 source for kayaking and canoeing information.               FREE Newsletter!
my Profile
 





 
Advice, Suggestions and General Help New Topic Printer Friendly Version

  16' heavy fiberglass Still Water???
  Posted by: DPForumDog on Sep-30-13 9:19 PM (EST)
   Category: unassigned 

There is a " 16' heavy fiberglass Still Water " advertised on Craigslist in our area. We are newbies and I want to make sure it would be good for us.

Our water is smooth, shallow and calm. I am old fat and tired.

We currently have a 17' alumacraft which is very light weight and fast, but to me it seems a little shaky. I think the " 16' heavy fiberglass Still Water " would be more stable but I am scared it would be too heavy or hard to paddle.

What do you think? Thanks
Granny DP
DPForumDog

 Great Products from the Buyers' Guide:

Kayak Motor Kit

Free Standing Boat Racks

Dual Rack

YakCatcher Rod Holder

Table of Contents




Messages in this Topic

 

  Boat heaviness
  Posted by: kayamedic on Sep-30-13 9:27 PM (EST)
has little to do with stability. Hull shape does.

Heaviness will lead to you not wanting to pick it up as often and could actually, if you are indeed out of shape, lead to injury.

I also suggest getting together with paddlers so that you can pick up some pointers so that you can paddle with more enjoyment. Its about the paddler more than the boat.

In the realm of canoes your Alumacraft is not a fast boat, but if it suits your outings fine. However 17 foot boats are usually quicker than 16 foot boats theoretically.
 
 
  The operative word is "old"
  Posted by: Guideboatguy on Sep-30-13 9:33 PM (EST)
-- Last Updated: Sep-30-13 9:35 PM EST --

One well-known person here is fond of saying that no one except college athletes are getting stronger. The rest of us are gradually getting weaker, and older folks are getting weaker at a faster rate. That's enough reason to shy away from ANY boat that might be heavy.

By the way, your Alumicraft canoe hardly qualifies as "light", and many good-quality fiberglass boats will be lighter, and fiberglass/Kevlar or all-Kevlar boats will be lighter still, but they aren't nearly as cheap as
a "heavy" fiberglass boat.

If I had a friend in your situation, I'd suggest sticking with the Alumacraft for a while, until they got quite a bit more familiar with how that boat feels on the water, and what it's like to carry. That kind of experience will make anyone that much better at choosing an eventual replacement, or asking the right questions about choosing a replacement, or even deciding that the current boat will be good enough. Lots of people are happy forever with a boat like the Alumacraft. It's not for "pros", but among entry-level canoes you could do a whole lot worse.

 
 
  I'm not getting weaker ...
  Posted by: vic on Sep-30-13 11:45 PM (EST)
I'm not getting weaker, my canoe is getting heavier.

That's my story and I'm sticking to it.
 
 
  Alumacraft used to be chosen over
  Posted by: ezwater on Oct-01-13 4:04 PM (EST)
Grummans for marathon racing in the aluminum class, because Alumacraft had a better hullform. But they were still pretty stable, and were often chosen by outfitters as rentals.

There were lightweight Alumacrafts as well as Grummans, and they *were* light, but dented easier.
 

Google
 
Web Paddling.net


Follow us on:
Free Newsletter | About Us | Site Map | Advertising Info | Contact Us

©2014 Paddling.net Inc.
Sweepstakes Banjo Shirt