Your #1 source for kayaking and canoeing information.               FREE Newsletter!
my Profile
 





 
Advice, Suggestions and General Help New Topic Printer Friendly Version

  Disagree with the OP's definition
  Posted by: Glenn_MacGrady on Sep-02-13 12:43 PM (EST)
 

The OP is essentially defining as a "rec kayak" any kayak that has no bulkheads or only one bulkhead. Logically, less-than-two-bulkheadedness can be a general feature of a rec kayak without defining the class of rec kayaks. Stated differently, kayaks other than rec kayaks can have less than two bulkheads.

For example, Mariner kayaks were usually sold without any bulkheads. The Broze brothers generally recommended against bulkheads and in favor of bags. Yet, I don't think anyone would call a 17' composite Mariner kayak costing $3000 a rec kayak.

So also canoes. Some canoes have built-in flotation tanks (a form of bulkead) and some don't. That feature does not in my lexicon define something as a "rec canoe". In fact, the most expensive racing canoes may be the hulls without flotation.




 Great Products from the Buyers' Guide:

Kayak & Canoe Covers

See Bags

Adventure Sailrigs

2-3 Canoe/Kayak Trailer

Table of Contents

Google
 
Web Paddling.net


Follow us on:
Free Newsletter | About Us | Site Map | Advertising Info | Contact Us

©2014 Paddling.net Inc.
Sweepstakes Shirt Sale