Your #1 source for kayaking and canoeing information.               FREE Newsletter!
my Profile
 





GRUMMAN CANOES
FREE SHIPPING on all canoes until May 14
See Paddling.net for great reviews
www.canoeinglife.com
 
Advice, Suggestions and General Help New Topic Printer Friendly Version

  Concept vs actuality
  Posted by: carldelo on Sep-20-12 10:54 PM (EST)
 

The stagnation line is not a concept, it is a fact of 3-D fluid flow over an object. It marks the boundary between the flow that goes over one side of the object, vs flow that goes over the other side.

A stagnation line exists on a paddle as it must, because some fluid flows around one side, and some flows around the other. A stagnation point only exists in 2-D flow; flow over a paddle is decidedly 3-D. There is no such thing as a stagnation area. Any intro fluids text should suffice to explain the concept in more detail.

Re: the flutter argument, it's clear to me that the ridge will reduce flutter, based on my experience in experimental fluid mechanics. No one is saying that a ridge is the only, or even the best way of avoiding flutter - that's your supposition, I think.

The fact that you've only seen a ridge on a cheap Euro paddle, and that racers don't use paddles with a ridge means nothing, of course. It's an argument, of course, but not proof of anything, as I think you must admit.

 Great Products from the Buyers' Guide:

Yakgrips

Cartop Kayak Carriers

Touring Kayak Paddles

Dual Rack

Table of Contents

Google
 
Web Paddling.net


Follow us on:
Free Newsletter | About Us | Site Map | Advertising Info | Contact Us

©2014 Paddling.net Inc.
Paddling.net Sweepstakes Shirt Sale